17 July 2009

The Cookie Crumbles No More…

I had to stop for a moment to reflect on the passing of an American legend today. Although I never had the opportunity to witness a newscast anchored by Missouri native Walter Cronkite, I'm sure most Americans who remember him in the anchor chair will pause and remember many moments from his 19-year stint as the anchor of the CBS Evening News.

This comes just three days prior to the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission, where Cronkite sat in front of the camera, just as captivated and amazed as his audience when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin set foot on the moon. But there are two moments I'll most remember and hope remain enshrined forever on YouTube and other video hosting Web sites:

First is that of Cronkite announcing to the world the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally, and subsequently reacting to the official statement. (Uncut footage of coverage from the day can be found here; first of nine parts 10 minutes each.) Second is his breaking from his role as a reporter to deliver a stinging criticism of the handling of the Vietnam War. In both instances, Cronkite influenced the evolution of television and American History.

Tonight, America has lost a media pioneer and icon of a generation. His calm demeanor, his desire to provide to the audience the entire story, and his congenial and reassuring presence as America transitioned from postwar bliss into a world of uncertainty will reverberate for years, among journalists and viewers alike. In a world where a multitude of media options and tastes exist, few if any will ever be able to capture the unified trust and audience that Cronkite maintained for almost two decades.

Cronkite was 92. As a native of St. Joseph who received his broadcasting start at KCMO in Kansas City, Cronkite is enshrined in the Hall of Famous Missourians.

And that's the way it is, Friday, July 17, 2009. Er, Saturday, July 18, 2009 in the Eastern Hemisphere.

A Fortnight in the Kentish Wilderness

And yes, by wilderness I mean no Twitter, no Blogger, no e-mail, etc. etc.

Unfortunately, this means I miss Thursday's by-election in the Norwich North constituency. Labour is struggling to maintain its margin of 5500 votes following the resignation of Ian Gibson, whom Labour delisted following his extravagant expense claims. Twelve candidates, including three independents and the first candidate from the "NOTA" party (None Of The Above), are contesting the race, which is Labour's next big test as to whether they stand a chance of another term in Parliament.

So until two Fridays from now…

P.S.: GO TOM WATSON!

14 July 2009

Tour of MO Conference Call: Kinder declares victory for Tour fans, volunteers

Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder thanked supporters of the Tour of Missouri in a news conference call Tuesday afternoon, saying they helped save the nascent cycling race from collapsing because of budget cuts and that the victory was theirs.

He also took aim at Governor Nixon's previous lack of support, as highlighted by KY3's David Catanese, but welcomed the governor as a new supporter of the race.

An audio summary of this afternoon's call (where no questions were taken) follows:

I think I broke the camel's back…

If my handwritten letter arrived in Jefferson City today, which I believe is possible, then the camel's back just may have been broken.

Governor Nixon just announced that he will release the $1.5 million initially withheld from the Tour of Missouri. In exchange, the Tour's organizing company and the Department of Tourism will publish their ledgers for public review.

For cyclists in le Tour de France slated to compete in the Tour of Missouri this September, this is definitely a happy Bastille Day.

10 July 2009

The Second of Two Open Letters

No, I'm not going to handwrite this one and send it out; too many people to send to and their address is changing from day to day. Oh, and they do have bigger fish to fry over the next two weeks.

To the cyclists committed to the Tour of Missouri:

Certainly you've read by now, or heard about, reports of the Tour of Missouri's funding being cut, putting the event in jeopardy. The timing of this move could not be worse: less than two months before the 600-mile trek through the Show-Me State, and in the middle of cycling's largest stage.

It is my hope, as a cycling fan and native Missourian, that you will lend your voice to encourage the continuation of this wonderful and fast-growing event in the States. With a large contingent of riders from North America making their marks in international circuits, it is important to keep nascent races like the Tour of Missouri in operation to engender interest in cycling.

I humbly ask that, during interviews with the press while riding through the French countryside this month, you please verbally commit your support and intention to race in this September's Tour of Missouri.

Thank you and hope to see you on the roads of Missouri soon.

Sincerely,
/s/ Kyle Hill
Folkestone, Kent, UK
(Formerly Kansas City, MO)

The First of Two Open Letters

The following will be handwritten and sent via post later today. Hopefully it'll arrive and just might be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

10 July 2009

The Hon. Jeremiah "Jay" Nixon
Governor of Missouri
P.O. Box 720
Jefferson City, MO 65102

Governor Nixon,

By now you have heard from perhaps thousands of enthusiastic cycling fans and Missourians alike, hoping you will reverse the proposed $1.5 million reduction of spending to the Tour of Missouri. It has perhaps been explained repeatedly that this is by far Missouri's largest sporting event, larger even than next week's All-Star Game in St. Louis.

Save the occasional visit by the Toronto Blue Jays to Kauffman Stadium, the Tour of Missouri is our state's only opportunity to host an international sporting contest. And this contest isn't confined to the stadia of our two major metropolitans. Over the span of a week in September, dozens of the world's top cyclists tackle the breathtaking scenery and relentless terrain of Missouri's sideroads, bringing a globally popular sport to outstate areas. Fans from around the world, many fresh from cheering on their favourite teams in France, will line the highways around Jackson, Salem, Vienna, Utica, and countless other smaller towns that otherwise would go without notice even to their fellow Missourians from Kansas City and St. Louis. These fans bring with them the spending power of the Euro, Sterling, and other world currencies, introducing new revenue into the various businesses along the route and sponsoring the tour.

For who do these fans and visitors to the Show-Me State cheer? Of the 14 teams confirmed to appear in September, seven are currently racing in le Tour de France, and among their ranks share 22 championship jerseys from cycling's big three European and American races over the past decade and seven Olympic gold medals. Aside from the Tour of California, the Tour of Missouri is their only other opportunity to experience quality competition in the United States.

I write this letter 4400 miles away, in the English county of Kent. Two years ago, the Tour de France rolled through here from London to Canterbury, and stories of that day remain popular among the natives. I have been in the area for only six weeks, and in that time have sought to promote my native Missouri to nearly everyone I meet. While the newest ambassador to the United Kingdom is a St. Louis native, I struggle to find signs of Missouri's current impact on the UK. In a recent BBC miniseries, where humourist Stephen Fry visited every state in the US, his stop in Missouri was at an abandoned warehouse in St. Louis where three homeless people were living. In terms of edibles, stores carrying wines from America have inventory only from California, ignoring our lush vineyards that the Tour of Missouri emphasises every year. The mere mention of Boulevards, toasted ravioli and pulled pork on a bun, perhaps our state's staple foods, draws blank stares. When I mention that I'm from Missouri, often I have to explain where in the United States we are and for what we're famous. Unfortunately, sometimes I have to mention a certain state to the west for context, prompting anecdotes about Dorothy and Toto.

I state the preceding because I see the potential the Tour has in promoting a positive image of Missouri to the world. I Since its inception, I have been most supportive of the Tour. In the inaugural race, I volunteered along the route at three separate stages. Were it not for my employment away from the Tour route, I would have done so last year and again this September. And since I first learned of the Tour, I feared that it would become a political football, both used by its supporters and detractors. Sadly, I believe it has become the case. I am fully aware of the partisan pressure that may be attached to resorting the funds. I too know the situation Missouri and much the world is facing economically, trying to find ways to keep afloat and re-evaluating spending priorities. Already this year's tour has an increase of sponsors, and the chance exists that next year enough sponsors will line up to negate the need for taxpayer assistance.

Of the world's most popular sports, no sport brings the top athletes to the farthest reaches of a region than cycling. It would be a considerable stretch to bring soccer's Beckham, Rooney or Ronaldo to our hometowns of DeSoto or Kirksville, and while one could predict the likelihood of Albert Pujols or Matt Cassel visiting either, they already bring positive name recognition to Missouri and thus don't capture the intrigue and buzz the way Lance Armstrong, Fabian Cancellara, Alberto Contador, Levi Leipheimer, Danny Pate, Christian VandeVelde and others could, should funding be fully restored to the Tour of Missouri.

The Tour of Missouri is a showcase of the entire state and puts many of our 114 counties in the spotlight. The state has poured tens of millions into athletic facilities including the Edward Jones Dome, the Chiefs' new training camp in St. Joseph, and several university athletic facilities; facilities that fans in outstate communities must drive to reach. By maintaining financial support for the Tour of Missouri, the state can not only show support for a truly international sport but also showcase an alternate method of transportation that is healthy for the rider and considerably more environmentally friendly.

Please fully restore funding to this major showcase of our great State.

Regards,
/s/ Kyle Hill
Folkestone, Kent, UK
(Formerly Kansas City, MO)

I have another letter in the works; however, as my printer has yet to arrive here, I now must transcribe this and make sure it's legible before mailing it off today.

09 July 2009

A Follow Up: Cameron's interview with NY Times

As I was scouting major U.S. media Web sites today to find who's reporting on the Guardian's report on widespread phone tapping by the Murdoch-owned News of the World tabloid, I found this interesting gem from The New York Times: an interview with Tory leader David Cameron, set to be published in their Sunday magazine.

Cameron has defied calls from members of Parliament to sack PR director Andy Coulson, who left his post as editor of News of the World following the initial hacking incident. This excerpt from the Cameron profile piece, written by Christopher Caldwell, might provide insight as to Cameron's apparent determination to keep Coulson on board:

The party is run, for the most part, by the intimates of Cameron who occupy a single suite of offices in Norman Shaw South, a parliamentary office building on the Thames, a block away from the Palace of Westminster. Iain Martin of The Telegraph coined the term “the Quartet” to describe the four figures — Cameron; his shadow chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne; his policy adviser, Steve Hilton; and his director of communications, Andy Coulson — who are at the heart of all the shadow government’s decisions.

. . . .Coulson is credited with translating Cameron’s agenda into terms that a nonmetropolitan public can understand: less about the environment and more about immigration. Less about social responsibility and more about social breakdown.

To assume Cameron needs coaching from Coulson or anyone else about the popular media may be to give Cameron too little credit. He spent seven years, after all, working at a television company that did a lot of down-market programming. Cameron makes his immersion in popular culture a point of pride. When he met Barack Obama last summer, he gave him the gift of some favorite CDs — the Smiths, Radiohead, Gorillaz, Lily Allen.

If Cameron's trying to become the next Thomas Dewey, this might be a start.

Plumbers of the World, a division of News Corp.

UK Media are in a frenzy today following a report by the Guardian targeting the tabloid News of the World, part of Rupert Murdoch's News International conglomeration along with Fox News, The Sun and The Times. Guardian's reports alleges that their lower-brow rival was systematically involved in a process of wire-tapping the phones and voice mails of various celebrities and politicos, and paying nearly £1 million to keep them from pressing charges. This re-opens a case from 2006 where one of their reporters, Clive Goodwin, was sentenced to four months of prison after being convicted of hacking into the mobile accounts of three members of the Royal family. Under oath to a select Parliamentary committee, editors and executives with News Corp. stated that Goodwin acted alone.

If that's the case, then Goodwin must have "1337 h4x0r sk11z" because documents obtained by Guardian (again Labour-leaning whilst Murdoch's operations are typically right-leaning) show that London's Tory mayor Boris Johnson, former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott, Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes, celebrity chef Nigella Lawson, supermodel Elle McPherson, actress Gwyneth Paltrow, and up to 3,000 others may have been spied upon by reporters and staff at News of the World and potentially other News Corp. papers.

There is a time when subterfuge is necessary in public interest. Given the wide-range and magnitude of these accusations, this describes more blatant invasion of privacy than public interest, by a private entity for monetary gain. Further, when subterfuge is necessary, the astute reporter & editor will seek a response from the targeted subject, be it before or after publication, and seek more public evidence to back up their findings, to mitigate the risk of defamation.

Several members of the House of Commons would definitely have liked to know that they were being spied upon, as they called for an investigation to determine what law enforcement knew and, if pertinent, why they didn't act on it. (Guess they now know what it feels like to be on the other end of Big Brother.) And certainly there is a political twist, as again: it's a Labour-leaning paper ratting out a right-wing operation. Andy Coulson, the former editor of News of the World, who resigned after the initial incident with Goodwin, is now the PR director for the Conservative Party.

Tory leader David Cameron says Coulson's current job is safe. And Coulson's old boss, Les Hinton, assumed command of The Wall Street Journal after News Corp. bought out Dow Jones.

I sense plenty of fodder for Keith Olbermann tonight.

04 July 2009

Four interesting points on the Fourth

So the big question anyone back home who thought about me today, here in the land of the one-time masters of North America, likely is "does anyone in England celebrate the Fourth of July?"

Well, I don't think anyone shoots off fireworks on the beach in Sandgate just because it's the first Saturday of the first full month of summer. Unfortunately, my fiancée was a bit ill today and so my top priority was to take care of her and not find out for myself by way of gallivanting around Folkestone screaming God Bless America as I symbolically dunk tea in the harbour and hold a moment of silence in memory of the brief political career of Sarah Palin.

So in lieu of wearing my Missouri state flag T-shirt out on the town today, I'm instead posting four interesting facts about the Fourth of July on this, the Fourth of July.

1. The Fourth of July was not the actual date when America declared its independence.
Today marks the date in 1776 when the Second Continental Congress formally adopted the exact wording of the Declaration of Independence, famously penned by Thomas Jefferson. However, the Congress agreed to declare its independence from Great Britain on July 2, in closed session. In one of his many letters to his wife Abagail, John Adams predicted that fireworks, games, parades, and so on throughout the land in celebration of America's independence. Only he saw it happening on the second of July, not the fourth.

More interesting, while the wording of the declaration was adopted on the fourth, the majority of the Congress didn't even sign the Declaration until August 2. And the man whom Americans no longer wished to have as their ruler, King George III, received the formal text from the Colonies until the end of August 1776.

2. The American Colonies rebelled from a Christian nation.
Yes, you read right. The United States, a land where a sizeable majority of people polled say they practice Christianity or another religion, formed from the original Thirteen Colonies, rebelled from the leader of a Christian denomination. The full title of George III was:
“George the Third, by the Grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, and so forth”
The title “Defender of the Faith” is conferred on the British Monarch by Parliament to indicate the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. As such, each monarch since Elizabeth I, plus the Cromwells during the interregnum of the 1650s, has been the church's figurehead. Thus, the Monarch must formally confirm the appointment of church leaders (as suggested by church officials to the Prime Minister, who then makes the appointments to the Monarch), including the highest appointment: Primate of All England and Archbishop of Canterbury.

Therefore, America, our “One Nation Under God”, rebelled from a nation lead by the leader of a significant Christian denomination, and didn't confer a religious title on the Presidency or Speaker of the House. But like the typical free-market advocates, Americans banded together regardless of religion: Anglicans, Baptists, Buddhists, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Lutherans, Pentecostals, Secular Humanists, etc. etc. to set up a great nation where the executive branch doesn't need an associated institution of religion established by law.

3. Although the United States declared its independence from Great Britain, fourteen states were never under British control.
Every state east of the Mississippi River, with exception to Florida, was part of the original land of the United States. Florida, however, was under British control for 20 years, gaining it from Spain in 1763 but ceding it 20 years later. Spanish ceded control of Florida in 1812. The southern tips of Alabama and Mississippi, plus much of Louisiana, were ceded in 1819.

A treaty in 1818 established a simple border between the United States and Britain's North American holdings west of the Great Lakes at the 49th parallel. As a result, lands in North Dakota and South Dakota east of the Missouri River, plus another portion of Minnesota, were ceded to the States from Britain. The 49th parallel boundary was extended to the Juan de Fuca Strait in 1846, with Britain dropping its claims to the Columbia Territory (Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and parts of Wyoming and Montana).

Alaska's southeast peninsula was leased by the Russians to the British for 30 years, with the lease not transferring over when Seward's purchase occurred in 1867. So who does that leave?

Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah.

The 14 states listed were, at one point or another, either under French or Spanish control prior to becoming ultimately part of the United States. (It's possible that northernmost areas of California, Nevada and Utah were under British control. Mexico claimed their northern border from 1821 to 1848 as the 42nd parallel.) Despite Hawaii having the only state flag including a Union Jack, the islands were never under British control. While James Cook commanded the first European fleet to arrive at the islands, Hawaii's tribal chiefs were united by one independent kingdom rather than by way of European conquest.

So is there really a valid reason to celebrate the Fourth of July in these states that were never under control of George III? Would more valid dates here instead be May 2 (date of the Louisiana Purchase, 1803), March 2 (Texas' declaration of independence from Mexico, 1836), December 29 (date of Texas' annexation into the U.S., 1845), March 10 (Mexican cessation per Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, 1848), or July 7 (Hawaii's annexation, 1898)?

4. 43 additional nations have national holidays celebrating their independence from Great Britain.
Of those 43 nations, 34 are members of the Commonwealth of Nations, formally named the British Commonwealth. Despite 38 declaring their independence during the reign of Queen Elizabeth II, eight still recognise her as their head of state.

None of these nations had their Declarations of Independence promulgated on July 4, or July 2, or August 2.